Best cheap prints: Are Francis Bacon posters worth framing
Are cheap Francis Bacon posters worth framing—or should you invest in the best cheap prints?
Cheap Francis Bacon posters are not worth framing long-term due to their offset-lithograph production on low-gsm paper, which yellows and fades within 5–10 years under normal light, but high-resolution archival reproductions on 310 gsm cotton rag with pigment inks (the best cheap prints in the $80–$250 range) can last 80+ years with proper framing.
Material differences: offset lithograph vs. archival giclée
The posters sold as "cheap Francis Bacon prints" are almost universally offset lithographs: mass-produced using oil-based inks on 120–170 gsm wood-pulp paper. According to the Library of Congress—Preservation, such materials degrade visibly within a decade due to acid content and ink instability. The Fine Art Trade Guild defines giclée as the archival alternative: pigment-based inks (8–12 color channels) on 100% cotton rag paper (250–310 gsm), with lightfastness ratings exceeding 100 years under UV-filtered glazing.
For reference, a standard 50x70 cm (20x28 in) offset-litho poster costs $15–$40; the same size as a giclée on 310 gsm Hahnemühle or Canson Infinity rag paper ranges from $120–$250, depending on edition size. The latter matches the tactile quality of a museum-quality Francis Bacon print—without the six-figure price.
Longevity: why 90% of framed posters fail within 10 years
The primary failure points are ink and substrate. Offset-litho inks fade at 20–40% exposure to 450 nm light (standard indoor lighting) within 5 years, per ISO 105-B02 tests. The wood-pulp paper yellows due to lignin breakdown, accelerating when framed without acid-free matting. By contrast, pigment inks (e.g., Epson UltraChrome) on cotton rag resist fading for 80–120 years under the same conditions, assuming UV-protective glazing (99% UV block).
Framing choices compound the issue. Standard acrylic glazing transmits ~60% UV; conservation glass (e.g., Tru Vue Museum Glass) blocks 99% but adds $150–$300 to framing costs. Acid-free matting (4–8 ply, 100% cotton) isolates the print from environmental contaminants, but most budget framers use lignin-rich backer boards that defeat the purpose.
Optical tradeoffs: matte vs. glossy in a family home
Glossy finishes amplify color saturation but reflect 8–12% of incident light, creating glare in brightly lit rooms. Matte surfaces diffuse light, reducing reflection to 1–3%, but can mute dark tones (critical for Bacon’s shadows). For family homes, a semi-matte or "satin" finish (e.g., Canson’s Baryta Photographique) balances both, with a Dmax (deepest black) of 2.2–2.4 versus 2.6 for gloss.
Offset-litho posters often use high-gloss coatings to mask low ink density, which exaggerates fingerprints and dust. Archival giclées on cotton rag typically offer matte or textured finishes (e.g., "torchon" weave) that align with original painting surfaces. For Bacon’s work, where texture conveys brushwork, a matte rag paper better approximates the tactile quality of his canvases.
Framing economics: when the print costs less than the frame
A well-executed frame (acid-free matting, conservation glazing, sealed back) costs 2–3x the print for sizes up to 50x70 cm (20x28 in). For example:
- $30 offset-litho poster + $200 framing = $230 total (5-year lifespan).
- $180 giclée on 310 gsm rag + $300 framing = $480 total (80-year lifespan).
The break-even point occurs at ~15 years. Before that, the offset print requires reframing (due to degradation) at a cumulative cost exceeding the archival option. For collectors, the giclée retains secondary-market value; posters do not. Artsy—Art Market notes that even unsigned giclées of blue-chip artists (Bacon, Hockney) sell for 30–50% of retail in resale markets, while posters have no residual value.
Alternatives: limited editions and open-edition archival prints
For those prioritizing authenticity, limited-edition estate-stamped prints (e.g., Bacon’s Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion reproductions) are available through galleries like Tate for $1,200–$3,500. Open-edition archival giclées from licensed printers (e.g., Triptych—May–June 1973 at 70x100 cm / 28x40 in) occupy the $200–$500 range.
Comparable artists’ prints—such as Hiroshi Nagai’s silkscreens or David Hockney’s Pool series—demonstrate how archival materials preserve value. A 1980s Nagai offset poster may sell for $50; a 2010s giclée on rag paper fetches $300–$600. The metric is not initial cost but cost-per-year of display: $480 over 80 years ($6/year) versus $230 over 5 years ($46/year).
Common questions
What is the minimum gsm for a framable print?
250 gsm is the practical minimum for framable cotton-rag prints. Below this (e.g., 200 gsm), the paper risks cockling under humidity or sagging in large formats (50x70 cm+). Canson’s Arches 88 (310 gsm) is the industry standard for pigment-ink longevity.
How does UV-protective glazing affect print lifespan?
UV-filtering glazing (99% block) extends a pigment-ink print’s lifespan by 3–5x versus standard glass. Without it, even archival inks fade at 20–30 years. Tru Vue’s Museum Glass or Optium Acrylic add $150–$300 to framing but eliminate 90% of light damage.
What hanging height preserves prints longest?
Mount the frame’s center at 145–150 cm (57–60 in) from the floor. This places the print above direct sunlight (from windows) and reduces exposure to humidity fluctuations near floors. The two-thirds rule (top edge 55–60 cm above furniture) further limits environmental stress.



Sources & further reading
Framed fine-art prints, made to last
Archival cotton-rag paper, pigment inks, hand-framed to order.
Browse the collection