Choosing a mat for David Hockney prints

Also available inFRIT
Framing guidance

What color mat for a David Hockney print?

Use a white or off-white mat with a David Hockney print—specifically a 100% cotton-rag, acid-free mat in 230–310 gsm, with a 7–10 cm (3–4 in) border to preserve the composition’s balance.

Hockney’s A Bigger Splash (1967) and the Color Bands from his 1973 Wadsworth Portfolio rely on saturated blues, turquoise, and flat color fields. A neutral mat avoids competing with these tones while adhering to conservation standards. The Fine Art Trade Guild defines acid-free matting as essential for longevity, and white or off-white cotton rag meets this without altering the print’s intent.

The mat’s role in a framed Hockney print

A mat serves two functions: visual separation and physical protection. For Hockney’s work—particularly his pool scenes or the geometric Color Bands—the mat’s width should equal 20–25% of the print’s shortest dimension. For an A2 (42x59.4 cm / 16.5x23.4 in) print, this means a 7–10 cm (3–4 in) border. Wider mats suit larger formats (e.g., 50x70 cm / 20x28 in).

The American Institute for Conservation notes that mats prevent glazing from adhering to the print surface, reducing condensation risk. Cotton rag (230–310 gsm) is the standard; avoid lignin-based boards, which yellow over time. Hockney’s own editions, such as those held by the Tate, typically use neutral window mats to direct focus to the ink.

Color logic: why white or off-white

Hockney’s palette in A Bigger Splash and the Wadsworth Portfolio relies on high-contrast blues, cerulean, and occasional warm accents (e.g., the diver’s pink in Portrait of an Artist (Pool with Two Figures)). A white mat (e.g., Arctic White or Bright White) maintains this contrast without introducing a third hue. Off-white (e.g., Warm White or Natural) softens the transition for prints with creamier backgrounds, such as his later iPad drawings.

“The mat’s color should never ‘complete’ the image—it should disappear.”

For reference, MoMA’s print study collections default to neutral mats for postwar works, including Hockney’s. Avoid black or colored mats: they shrink the perceived image size and fight the print’s flat color fields. An exception exists for his 1980s collages (e.g., Pearblossom Hwy), where a thin black border can echo the photographic edges—but this does not apply to A Bigger Splash.

Glazing and UV protection

The mat is one half of the protection equation. For pigment-based giclée prints (the standard for Hockney reproductions), use UV-protective glazing: either acrylic (e.g., Optium Museum Acrylic, 99% UV block) or glass (e.g., Conservation Clear, 70% UV block). Acrylic is lighter and shatter-resistant; glass offers superior clarity but adds weight (a 50x70 cm / 20x28 in frame with glass weighs ~3.5–4.5 kg / 8–10 lbs).

The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s framing guidelines specify UV glazing for works on paper, citing pigment degradation under 450–500 nm light. For a framed Hockney print in direct sunlight, acrylic is mandatory. Expect to pay $120–$250 for a 50x70 cm / 20x28 in UV acrylic panel, installed.

Framing proportions and hanging

The frame’s outer dimensions should extend 5–7 cm (2–2.75 in) beyond the mat on all sides. For an A2 print with a 7 cm mat, the framed size becomes ~56x73 cm (22x29 in). Standard frame depths range from 2.5–4 cm (1–1.5 in); deeper profiles suit textured prints (e.g., Hockney’s hand-pulled lithographs) but add unnecessary bulk to flat giclées.

Hang the print so its midpoint sits 145–150 cm (57–60 in) from the floor—the Fine Art Trade Guild’s recommended centre height. Above furniture, leave 20–25 cm (8–10 in) between the frame’s bottom edge and the surface (the “two-thirds rule”: the print should occupy roughly two-thirds of the wall space above the furniture).

Resolving the complexity concern

The framing process reduces to four irreversible choices: mat color (white/off-white), mat material (100% cotton rag), glazing (UV acrylic/glass), and frame depth (2.5–4 cm). All other variables—width, hang height—follow proportional rules. For a David Hockney print, the risk of error lies in overcustomization: colored mats, non-UV glazing, or asymmetric borders. Stick to neutral, archival materials, and the result will align with gallery standards.

Cost for a 50x70 cm / 20x28 in framed Hockney print, professionally executed:

  • Cotton-rag mat, UV acrylic glazing, solid wood frame: $400–$650
  • Add conservation backing, French cleat hanging system: $650–$900

Common questions

Does Hockney approve specific mats for his prints?

Hockney has not publicly endorsed matting choices, but his estate’s authorized printers (e.g., Tyler Graphics) use neutral cotton-rag mats for editions. The 1973 Wadsworth Portfolio originals, held by institutions like the National Gallery of Art, are framed with white or off-white window mats.

Can I use a black mat for A Bigger Splash?

Black mats shrink the perceived image size and conflict with Hockney’s flat color fields. They suit high-contrast photography (e.g., Hiroshi Nagai’s work) but overwhelm the balanced composition of A Bigger Splash. If contrast is desired, use a thin black frame with a white mat.

How does UV glazing affect the print’s appearance?

UV-protective acrylic (e.g., Optium) has a slight warm cast but blocks 99% of UV light. Conservation glass (e.g., Tru Vue) is optically clearer but blocks only 70–90%. The difference is invisible under indoor lighting; the choice depends on exposure risk, not aesthetics.

Framed fine-art prints, made to last

Archival cotton-rag paper, pigment inks, hand-framed to order.

Browse the collection