Choosing a mat color for Lichtenstein’s color bands
What color mat for a Whaam! print: matching the color bands (Wadsworth Portfolio)
Use a neutral white or soft gray mat—250–310 gsm cotton-rag, acid-free—with a 7–10 cm (3–4 in) border to frame a Whaam! print, ensuring the mat’s tone does not compete with Lichtenstein’s primary color bands.
The mat’s role: isolation, not decoration
Roy Lichtenstein’s Whaam! (1963) relies on high-contrast Ben-Day dots and flat primary hues—yellow, red, blue—against white. The mat’s function is to create optical separation between the print and its environment, not to introduce additional color. A bright white mat (e.g., Arctic White, 310 gsm) preserves the print’s comic-book intensity; a warm white or soft gray (5–10% black) reduces glare under UV-protective glazing.
For reference, the Tate’s Art Terms notes Pop Art’s dependence on “bold, simple, everyday imagery”—a principle that extends to framing. Avoid colored mats (e.g., black, red) that risk visual conflict with the print’s existing palette. The mat’s width should scale with print size: 7 cm (3 in) for 50x70 cm (20x28 in) prints; 10 cm (4 in) for 70x100 cm (28x40 in) or larger.
Material and conservation standards
The mat must be acid-free, lignin-free cotton-rag (e.g., 250–310 gsm) to prevent yellowing or fiber degradation over time. The American Institute for Conservation’s Caring for Your Treasures specifies that mats “should pass the Photographic Activity Test (PAT)” to ensure archival stability. A 4-ply mat (3.2 mm thickness) provides adequate depth for a framed Lichtenstein print without overwhelming the print’s graphic flatness.
Cost considerations: Unbuffered cotton-rag mats range from $40–$120 per linear meter, depending on gsm and supplier. Pre-cut mats for standard sizes (e.g., 50x70 cm / 20x28 in) reduce waste but limit customization. For prints exceeding 100 cm (40 in) in either dimension, consult a framer specializing in oversize works to avoid seam lines in the mat.
Glazing: UV protection and reflection control
UV-protective glazing is non-negotiable for Pop Art prints, which often use fugitive inks. Opt for 99% UV-blocking acrylic (e.g., Optium Museum Acrylic) or low-iron glass with a UV filter. The Fine Art Trade Guild’s framing standards recommend glazing that blocks “at least 97% of UV radiation” to slow color shift in pigment-based prints.
Reflection control matters in residential settings. A matte or satin finish (e.g., Artglass AR 70) reduces glare by 70–90% compared to standard glass, critical for prints hung opposite windows. For Whaam!, avoid non-glare glazing with excessive diffusion—it can soften Lichtenstein’s sharp edges. Expect to allocate $200–$600 for glazing alone, depending on size and material.
Resolving the complication: a framing specification
The underlying concern—that framing feels easy to get wrong—stems from the interplay of mat color, glazing, and print size. The solution is a fixed specification:
- Mat: 8-ply (6.4 mm) cotton-rag, Arctic White or Cool Gray (10% black), 8 cm (3.25 in) border for a 50x70 cm (20x28 in) print.
- Glazing: 99% UV-blocking acrylic, matte finish, 2.5 mm thickness.
- Frame: Thin-profile metal (e.g., 2 cm / 0.8 in aluminum) in black or silver; wood frames risk competing with the print’s industrial aesthetic.
- Hanging: Centered at 148 cm (58 in) from floor to midpoint, per the two-thirds rule for wall art above furniture.
“The mat’s width should equal the print’s width divided by eight”—a ratio derived from the Fine Art Trade Guild’s proportional guidelines for modern prints.
Context: Lichtenstein and the Wadsworth Portfolio
Whaam! is part of Lichtenstein’s broader engagement with color bands, a technique also explored in works like Preparatory Study for Brushstroke (1965) and the Wadsworth Portfolio (1969). The portfolio’s linear color transitions (e.g., Color Band) share Whaam!’s reliance on flat, unmodulated hue—further justification for a neutral mat. For comparison, Hiroshi Nagai’s prints (e.g., Color Test Chart) often use thin white borders, while Sol LeWitt’s Wadsworth works favor no mat at all, floating the print within the frame.
A framed Lichtenstein print in a domestic setting should adhere to the same principles as gallery display: minimal interference with the artwork’s inherent contrast. The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s print department, for instance, typically uses a 5 cm (2 in) white mat for mid-century American prints—a benchmark for residential framing.
Common questions
Does a black mat work for Whaam!?
A black mat risks merging with the print’s outlines, reducing legibility. Lichtenstein’s black is a functional contour, not a framing element. Stick to white or gray to preserve the comic-book clarity.
What’s the cost difference between matte and glossy glazing?
Matte acrylic (e.g., Optium Acrylic) costs 20–30% more than standard glass—$300–$500 for 70x100 cm (28x40 in). Glossy UV glass is cheaper ($150–$300) but reflects 8–12% of light, per MoMA’s framing guidelines.
How does framing a 50x70 cm (20x28 in) Whaam! differ from a 100x140 cm (40x55 in)?
Larger prints require wider mats (10–12 cm / 4–5 in) and thicker glazing (3 mm+) to prevent warping. Costs scale linearly with perimeter: a 100x140 cm (40x55 in) frame may exceed $1,200 for materials alone, excluding labor.



Sources & further reading
Framed fine-art prints, made to last
Archival cotton-rag paper, pigment inks, hand-framed to order.
Browse the collection