Choosing the right size for David Hockney prints
What size David Hockney print works above a sofa
For a standard three-seater sofa (180–210 cm / 71–83 in wide), a David Hockney print at 70×100 cm (28×40 in) or 80×120 cm (32×47 in) maintains proportion, leaving 15–30 cm (6–12 in) of clearance on either side when framed.
Proportion relative to furniture width
The two-thirds rule governs balanced placement. The print’s width (including frame) should occupy roughly two-thirds of the sofa’s length. A 180 cm (71 in) sofa suits a 100–120 cm (40–47 in) wide print; a 210 cm (83 in) sofa accommodates up to 140 cm (55 in).
David Hockney’s works, like Pool with Two Figures (1972) or A Bigger Splash (1967), often reproduce at 70×100 cm or 80×120 cm—sizes that align with this ratio. Larger editions (e.g., 100×150 cm / 40×59 in) require sofas exceeding 240 cm (94 in) to avoid overwhelming the space.
Vertical clearance and hanging height
The center of the print should hang 145–150 cm (57–60 in) from the floor, regardless of sofa height. This standard, referenced by the Victoria and Albert Museum in their exhibition guidelines, ensures the artwork aligns with average eye level. Measure 50–60 cm (20–24 in) above the sofa back to the print’s lower edge.
For example, a 70×100 cm Hockney print in a 5 cm (2 in) frame totals 80×110 cm. Its midpoint (55 cm from top or bottom) would sit at 150 cm from the floor if the sofa back is 85 cm tall. Use a laser level to confirm before drilling.
Matting and framing considerations
Acid-free conservation matting adds 7.5–10 cm (3–4 in) to each dimension, while a standard profile frame (3–5 cm / 1.2–2 in wide) increases the footprint further. A 70×100 cm print becomes 90×120 cm framed—factoring this in at purchase prevents misalignment.
Opt for UV-protective glazing (e.g., 99% UV-blocking acrylic) to guard Hockney’s pigment inks, which, per the Tate’s Art Terms, remain vulnerable to fading even in archival giclées (250–310 gsm cotton-rag). Matte finishes reduce glare in family homes; glossy accentuates color depth but reflects light.
Comparing print types for longevity
Offset lithographs (common in Hockney’s early editions) use oil-based inks on thinner paper (150–200 gsm), while archival giclées employ pigment inks on cotton-rag (310 gsm). The latter resists fading for 80–100 years under glass, per the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s print conservation standards.
A 70×100 cm giclée on Hahnemühle Photo Rag (308 gsm) costs $800–$1,200 unframed; the same size as an offset lithograph (if available) ranges $1,500–$3,000 due to scarcity. For collectors, the giclée’s fidelity to Hockney’s original hues often justifies the premium.
Resolving the fear of visual imbalance
The concern that a print will “look wrong” stems from disproportion or poor lighting. To mitigate this:
- Use painter’s tape to outline the print’s dimensions on the wall before purchasing. Step back 3 meters (10 ft)—the ideal viewing distance—to assess balance.
- For Hockney’s vibrant palettes, ensure ambient light is warm (2700–3000K) to avoid casting a blue tint on magentas or turquoises.
- If the sofa sits against a wall longer than 3 meters, center a larger print (e.g., 100×150 cm) and flank it with two smaller works (e.g., 30×40 cm) to distribute weight.
Common questions
How does a large David Jones framed print differ in proportion?
David Jones’ prints (e.g., The Garden Enclosed>, 1979) favor verticality. A 60×90 cm Jones print suits a 180 cm sofa if hung with its longer side horizontal, but a 70×100 cm Hockney aligns more naturally. Jones’ intricate linework benefits from closer viewing (2–2.5 m away).
Matte vs. glossy art prints for a family home?
Matte surfaces (e.g., Canson Rag Photographique) diffuse light, hiding fingerprints and reducing glare in bright rooms. Glossy (e.g., Ilford Gold Fibre Silk) enhances color saturation but shows reflections. For Hockney’s blues, matte preserves depth without competing with ambient light.
Offset lithograph vs. archival giclée for collectors?
Offset lithographs (e.g., Hockney’s 1970s editions) hold historical value but fade faster; giclées on cotton-rag (310 gsm) offer archival stability. A 1978 litho of Paper Pool 11 may sell for $2,500–$4,000; a 2020 giclée of the same image costs $900–$1,500 but retains color longer under UV glazing.



Sources & further reading
Framed fine-art prints, made to last
Archival cotton-rag paper, pigment inks, hand-framed to order.
Browse the collection