Untitled (1986)

The Bold Silence of Luis Feito’s 1986 Abstraction

This untitled 1986 work by Luis Feito distills the Spanish artist’s mature period into a single, commanding statement. By the mid-1980s, Feito had long abandoned the figurative influences of his early career in Madrid, embracing instead the raw physicality of Abstract Expressionism with a distinctly Iberian sensibility. The painting’s dense, textured surface—built from layers of oil applied with both brush and palette knife—reveals his dialogue with American abstractionists like Franz Kline, yet retains the chromatic intensity of his Mediterranean roots. As the Tate notes, Feito’s work from this era often explored the tension between spontaneity and control, a balance evident in the deliberate chaos of this composition.

The 30×40 cm format, though modest in scale, carries the weight of a much larger canvas through its aggressive mark-making and contrasting planes of black, ochre, and crimson. Feito’s use of diagonal slashes and jagged forms creates a sense of movement that belies the static nature of the medium. Unlike his earlier geometric abstractions, this piece leans into gestural freedom, yet the underlying structure—visible in the way forms cluster and recede—betrays a meticulous compositional mind. It’s a work that demands proximity; the tactile quality of the paint becomes apparent only upon close inspection, rewarding the viewer’s engagement with its physicality.

Feito in the 1980s: Between Madrid and New York

By 1986, Luis Feito had spent over three decades refining an abstract language that bridged European modernism and American postwar innovation. His peripatetic career—split between Spain, France, and repeated sojourns in New York—positioned him as a rare transatlantic figure in the Abstract Expressionist movement. Unlike his American counterparts, who often emphasized psychological depth, Feito’s work of this period focused on the materiality of paint itself. The thick impasto and visceral textures in Untitled reflect his belief that a painting should exist as an object, not merely an image.

This untitled piece belongs to a series of works from the mid-1980s where Feito abandoned titles entirely, insisting that the visual experience should speak without verbal mediation. The decision aligns with his growing interest in Zen philosophy, particularly the concept of ma—the spatial void that defines form. Here, the negative spaces between his slashing brushstrokes become as active as the painted marks, creating a rhythmic counterpoint that animates the surface. As MoMA’s overview of Abstract Expressionism observes, such works often prioritize the act of creation over representational goals, a principle Feito embraced wholeheartedly during this phase.

Feito’s 1986 abstractions reject the decorative in favor of the declarative. Each mark reads as a decision—irreversible, unapologetic—transforming the canvas into a record of physical and intellectual struggle.

The Physical Language of Abstraction

Composition: Controlled Chaos

The apparent spontaneity of Untitled belies its rigorous underlying structure. Feito divides the canvas into three horizontal bands—dark at the base, ochre in the middle, and a narrower crimson strip at the top—before disrupting this order with diagonal incisions. These slashing black lines, applied with a loaded brush, create a dynamic tension between the painting’s vertical and horizontal axes. The composition avoids symmetry but achieves balance through the careful distribution of visual weight, with denser clusters of activity anchored by areas of relative calm.

Surface and Texture: The Third Dimension

Feito’s technique in this work relies on the contrast between smooth and heavily textured passages. The ochre ground, thinly applied, serves as a foil for the thick, almost sculptural black and red strokes. He frequently used a palette knife to scrape away paint in certain areas, revealing underlying layers and adding depth. This method—part addition, part subtraction—gives the surface a topographical quality, where light casts subtle shadows across the ridges of dried oil. The tactile quality invites viewers to imagine the physical process of its creation, from the initial broad strokes to the final, deliberate scratches.

Displaying Feito’s Abstraction: A Guide to Placement

This 30×40 cm print commands attention without overwhelming a room, making it ideal for spaces that benefit from a focal point with intellectual weight. The dominant black and earth tones allow it to harmonize with modern interiors featuring concrete, wood, or neutral fabrics, while the crimson accents provide a vibrant counterpoint. For maximum impact, position the print at eye level in a well-lit area where its textural details can be appreciated—consider a study, library, or the primary wall of a living room. Avoid overly busy surroundings; Feito’s work thrives in dialogue with negative space, whether architectural or decorative.

The framing, designed to complement the painting’s raw energy, uses a slim dark wood profile that doesn’t compete with the composition. In smaller rooms, the print can anchor a gallery wall, but it holds its own equally well as a solitary statement piece. For collectors pairing it with other abstractions, maintain a distance of at least 50 cm between works to allow each breathing room. The matte finish of the print surface minimizes glare, making it suitable for spaces with natural light.

More Works by Luis Feito

Discover additional framed prints from Feito’s prolific career, spanning his early geometric phases to his later gestural abstractions.

Luis Feito

Composition I

View print

Luis Feito

Untitled 1

View print

Luis Feito

Sin Título Abstracción en Rojo y Negro

View print

Luis Feito

Painting 918

View print

You May Also Love

Modernism

Eyvind Earle

Fog Mist

View print

American Regionalism

Eyvind Earle

Barns

View print

Surrealism

Salvador Dalí

Untitled Head of a Spanish Nobleman

View print