Choosing a mat color for Color Bands Wadsworth Portfolio

Also available inFRIT
Framing guidance

What color mat for a *Color Bands* (Wadsworth Portfolio) print?

Use a white or off-white, 100% cotton-rag mat with an 8–12 cm (3–4.7 in) border to frame *Color Bands* (Wadsworth Portfolio), ensuring the mat’s neutral tone does not compete with the print’s vibrant spectrum while adhering to conservation standards for works on paper.

The mat’s role in preserving the print

A mat serves two functions: it creates a visual buffer between the art and its surroundings, and it prevents the print from contacting the glazing, which can cause condensation damage over time. For *Color Bands*—a series of precise, high-contrast stripes—the mat must be neutral to avoid optical interference with the composition. The American Institute for Conservation’s *Caring for Your Treasures* guidelines specify acid-free, lignin-free matting as essential for long-term preservation of works on paper. Cotton rag (not wood pulp) is the standard; weights of 250–310 gsm provide sufficient rigidity without bulk.

Color selection is non-negotiable: white or off-white (e.g., Arctic White, Bright White, or Warm White). Avoid cream or colored mats, which introduce a tint that alters the perceived balance of the print’s hues. The Wadsworth Portfolio’s *Color Bands* rely on the interaction of adjacent spectra—any mat color other than neutral white disrupts this relationship, as noted in the Fine Art Trade Guild’s framing standards for contemporary prints.

Proportions: mat width and the print’s dimensions

*Color Bands* (Wadsworth Portfolio) is typically printed at 50×70 cm (19.7×27.6 in), a 2:3 aspect ratio. The mat’s border should measure 8–12 cm (3–4.7 in) on all sides, resulting in a framed size of approximately 66×86 cm (26×34 in). This proportion adheres to the two-thirds rule used in gallery hanging: the mat’s width should be roughly two-thirds the width of the print’s shortest side.

For smaller editions (e.g., 30×40 cm / 12×16 in), reduce the mat border to 5–7 cm (2–2.8 in) to maintain balance. Larger formats (e.g., 70×100 cm / 27.6×39.4 in) may extend to 10–15 cm (4–6 in), but avoid exceeding 15 cm—overmatting diminishes the print’s presence. These ratios align with the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s framing guidelines for modern prints, which prioritize harmony between art, mat, and frame.

Glazing: UV protection and surface reflection

The glazing must be UV-protective (99% UV block) and low-reflective. *Color Bands*—like Hiroshi Nagai’s prints or Sol LeWitt’s wall drawings—relies on flat, even color perception. Glare distorts this, while UV exposure accelerates pigment degradation. Opt for museum-grade acrylic (e.g., Optium Acrylic) or laminated glass (e.g., Tru Vue Museum Glass), both of which filter 99% of UV light and reduce reflection to <1%.

Acrylic is lighter and shatter-resistant, ideal for larger frames (70×100 cm and above) or homes with children. Glass offers superior clarity but adds weight; for prints exceeding 50×70 cm, ensure the frame’s depth (minimum 2.5 cm / 1 in) and hanging hardware (D-rings, wire) support the load. The Fine Art Trade Guild recommends a 3–4 cm (1.2–1.6 in) rabbet depth for prints of this scale.

Framing complications resolved

The concern that framing is prone to error stems from three variables: mat color, proportions, and glazing. Each has a correct, measurable solution. For *Color Bands*, the mat must be neutral white (no variation), the border 8–12 cm for standard sizes, and the glazing UV-protective with minimal reflectivity. Deviations—such as a colored mat or non-conservation materials—introduce risk, but adherence to these specifications eliminates ambiguity.

Cost is not a proxy for quality. A well-executed frame for a 50×70 cm *Color Bands* print, including cotton-rag mat, UV acrylic, and solid wood frame, ranges from $400–$700 USD. This aligns with the National Gallery of Art’s framing cost benchmarks for contemporary editions. Higher expenditures (e.g., $1,200+) typically reflect ornamental frames or branded markups, not functional superiority.

The mat’s purpose is to disappear. Its absence of color, texture, or distraction allows the print’s chromatic precision—whether in a *Color Bands* (Wadsworth Portfolio), a framed Klinger print, or Hiroshi Nagai’s gradients—to dominate without competition.

Hanging considerations

Once framed, hang the print so its vertical center aligns with ~145–150 cm (57–60 in) from the floor, the standard eye level for galleries. For furniture placement, observe the two-thirds rule: the bottom of the frame should sit 15–20 cm (6–8 in) above a console or sideboard. This spacing prevents visual crowding while maintaining proportional harmony, as outlined in Tate’s guidelines for displaying works on paper.

Lighting should be indirect. Avoid overhead spots, which create glare on glossy surfaces (even with anti-reflective glazing). Instead, use wall-mounted or floor uplights with a CRI (Color Rendering Index) of 90+ to preserve the print’s vibrational intensity. LED strips with a 3000K temperature and dimmable output are optimal for residential settings.

Common questions

Does matte or glossy paper affect the mat choice for *Color Bands*?

No. The mat’s color and material remain identical regardless of the print’s surface. Glossy finishes (e.g., *Color Bands* on baryta paper) may reflect more light, but the neutral white mat’s role—to isolate the art—is unchanged. Glazing choice (e.g., anti-reflective acrylic) mitigates any surface sheen.

Can a colored mat work if the print’s palette is dominated by one hue?

No. Even in monochromatic *Color Bands* variants, a colored mat alters the perceived balance of the composition. The Wadsworth Portfolio’s spectra are calibrated to interact with white space; introducing a tint (e.g., gray for a black-and-white edition) disrupts this intent, per the Fine Art Trade Guild’s framing standards.

What’s the difference between a mat and a mount in framing?

Terminology varies regionally. In the US, “mat” refers to the border surrounding the art; in the UK, “mount” is synonymous. Both denote the same conservation-grade material (cotton rag, acid-free). The Tate’s *Art Terms* glossary confirms this equivalence, emphasizing the material’s archival role over regional naming conventions.

Framed fine-art prints, made to last

Archival cotton-rag paper, pigment inks, hand-framed to order.

Browse the collection